fishkin-33
Moz CEO Rand Fishkin.

In an unusual but characteristic display of corporate transparency, Moz co-founder Rand Fishkin today went public with a plan to step aside as CEO, but remain with the company — effectively switching roles with current COO Sarah Bird, who would become the company’s new chief executive under the proposal.

The announcement on the Moz blog was out-of-the-ordinary because the plan hasn’t been finalized and still needs to be discussed by the Moz board. Fishkin had a call on the topic just this morning with key investor Brad Feld.

Moz COO Sarah Bird.
Moz COO Sarah Bird.

In the post, which also includes an email sent to employees, Fishkin acknowledged that the past year at Moz has been difficult.

“In many ways, it’s been harder than even the 2002-2006 era when my Mom and I went deeply into debt and worried about paying the rent and being chased by creditors,” he wrote.

Fishkin noted that some of the difficulty in 2013 was due to, in his eyes, less-than-stellar business results. Moreover, he noted the challenges of dealing with a growing company of more than 135 employees.

“I’m still learning a tremendous amount, but I’m being challenged to such a degree on issues like organizational development, HR, conflict resolution, process building, and morale that I feel out of my depth, and poorly suited, especially from an emotional resiliency perspective, to meeting my obligations,” he wrote.

moz_logoFishkin, who co-founded the company back in 2004, still wants to remain at Moz — “I plan to be here for a long time to come,” he says. Now, though, he’d like to take a reduced role as an “individual contributor,” allowing him to focus more on his strengths and less on his weaknesses.

The move could come as soon as January. Fishkin ensured that if and when Bird becomes CEO, Moz’s mission and values will not change.

Fishkin likened his relationship with Bird, who joined Moz six years ago, to a road trip.

Fishkin speaking at the 2013 GeekWire Startup Day.
Fishkin speaking at the 2013 GeekWire Startup Day.

“I’ve been driving and she’s been in the passenger seat, navigating,” he wrote. “But while I really loved having the wheel for most of the journey, we’re getting into terrain I don’t love as much, and it might be time for Sarah and I to switch positions. She’ll be a different kind of driver and I’ll be a different kind of navigator, but we, the vehicle, and the passengers, will all be fine.”

Fishkin told employees that Bird will be a “great” CEO, and that “even when it comes to strategy, there will likely be very little difference to how we tackle initiatives.”

One other motivating factor was a potential IPO for Moz in the future.

“Given that, it would eventually be the case that I’d want to step aside and have someone else take the reigns,” Fishkin wrote. “Getting to do that now, years before an IPO, is a blessing, as it gives us time to get comfortable and means that external investors won’t be shaken by a leadership change.”

Here’s the email sent to employees in full:

Hey gang,

Thanks so much for taking an hour out of what I know are very busy and important schedules. As promised, I wanted to follow up for those of you who couldn’t make it in person (and anyone who wants a refresher).

Quick Recap: For the last year, the board, eteam, Sarah, and Rand have been talking about changing my role/title and making Sarah our CEO. A lot of that stems from my personal passion around being an individual contributor more than a people manager, and in wanting to spend more time focusing on my strengths – marketing, product, evangelism, etc. and less on my weaknesses – organizational development, financings, board/analyst management, etc.

At the last board meeting, we chatted about potentially making that move as soon as January. There’s a board call to follow up on that topic next week. Nothing is set in stone, but given that I’ve written about this a bit in 15Five and talked about it on ocassion with Mozzers, we wanted to have a more formal discussion with a chance for Q+A.

Questions that came up today and some answers to them:

A) When will this happen?

It’s still up in the air, but we’ll know more after the board call next week. Brad and I are also discussing this privately in a call on Wednesday morning.

B) What will Rand’s new role be?

My role will actually be very similar. I’ll likely be spending more time in the weeds with product design, marketing initiatives, and evangelism (blogging/speaking). I’ll continue to represent Moz externally quite a bit. But I won’t be doing much people managing (only Nicci will continue to report to me), work on our finances, organizational development stuff, or recruiting/hiring of senior staff. I’ve also promised to write a book next year on startup marketing!

I want to change my title to “individual contributor.” Mostly because it reflects my belief that you don’t need to manage people in order to have influence, I love and want to promote the IC track/concept, and that titles are kinda BS :-)

I will continue to be on the eteam and on the board of directors, representing internal shareholders (like y’all).

C) Can we share this news?

No! Please don’t.

While we love to be transparent, this is a sensitive topic that requires a lot of input and care. It’s going to be hard to convey it right and not send the message that this transition is just because of a slowing growth rate this year (which isn’t the truth, though some of the emotional challenges I’m dealing with may have been accelerated). We also don’t yet have the full details on a plan, and it’s hard to capture the nuance effectively.

Sarah and I have talked about potentially having me write a blog post on this sooner rather than later to at least bring up the idea externally. We’d hate to have it leak.

D) Will Moz’s mission/vision/values change?

No. We’ve been aligned on that stuff for many years. TAGFEE is here to stay. Helping people do better marketing is here to stay. Powering the shift from interruption to inbound is here to stay.

Even when it comes to strategy, there will likely be very little difference to how we tackle initiatives. In fact, as Nicci and I were chatting today, I remarked that having the CEO title has, in my opinion, not helped me win any arguments with Sarah over the years. We’ve always needed to be on the same page or at least comfortable with each other’s decisions to move forward and I strongly suspect that will remain the case in the future.

What may change are some organizational elements – for example, as Sarah noted today, she’d like to have more regular company-wide town hall Q+A sessions where anyone/everyone on the team can ask questions to the eteam and expect a direct response.

E) Why does Rand want to be something other than CEO?

There are three big reasons (and lots of smaller ones):

#1 – As Moz has grown in number of people, I’ve often felt overwhelmed, out-of-my-depth, and emotionally challenged to handle the complexities of intra-team conflicts, morale, and organizational development issues. I want to do what I love and what I’m good at, and I believe I’ll be healthier and happier and Moz will be better served by me taking that role. Sadly, it’s not what a CEO needs to do at a 100+ person company and definitely not at 300 or 500+ (which we might be someday).

#2 – I don’t really ever want to be CEO of a public company, and someday, we hope Moz can reach the metrics that would give us eligibility for a public offering. Given that, it would eventually be the case that I’d want to step aside and have someone else take the reigns. Getting to do that now, years before an IPO, is a blessing, as it gives us time to get comfortable and means that external investors won’t be shaken by a leadership change.

#3 – I believe Sarah will be a fantastic CEO. She’s stepped up to every challenge that ever come her way at Moz, and I believe this one will be no different. I honestly believe she can do this job better than I can, and that means good things for all of us and for the value of our shares, too.

p.s. One of those smaller reasons is that I love the idea of Moz positively contributing to the awful inequality of women in the leadership role at technology startup companies.

F) Does this mean Rand will leave in the near future?

Hell no. It’s impossible to describe how much of my personal identity and ego and heart are connected to this company. You’d have to push me kicking and screaming. I plan to be here for a long time to come.

G) Is this because Moz’s performance in 2013 wasn’t as good as past years?

No.

The tough year we’ve had has weighed more heavily on me than it probably should have, and that’s part of the reason we’ve been thinking about doing this sooner rather than waiting a little longer (we’d originally wanted to do some more hiring so Sarah would have fewer direct reports, and sorted out some other issues first, but we may bias to action on this one). But, if we’d had the best year we’ve ever had, we’d probably still be discussing this in the plan for sometime in 2014. In fact, Sarah and I had conversations to that effect long before the launch delays and invite list issues.

H) What kind of CEO will Sarah be?

A great one, and probably a better one than me :-)

In all seriousness, it’s hard to say for certain, but it will likely feel very familiar and Sarah does a lot of CEO-type things today. I’ll let her tackle this one more, but she did so quite eloquently today at the Town Hall, talking about where her strengths lie (much more on the people, operations, financing, and scaling side vs. my product/marketing/industry strengths).

I) What if things don’t go well with Sarah at the helm?

We’ll figure out a plan. We’re certainly aware of many times in startup’s lives when a CEO transitions out and back in. I’ve gotten to talk to a number of CEOs who’ve made this transition and we’re doing all we can to prepare. To be honest, I feel very confident as Sarah’s been much more like a co-CEO these past 6 years than most people know. If she wasn’t a good fit, we’d have known a long time ago.

That said, the board will talk about it, and I will most certainly be here to help in whatever way needed, including filling back in should Moz need me in that role.

If you have other questions, please ask and we’d be happy to answer.

All the hugs!

[Editor’s Note: Moz is a GeekWire annual sponsor.]

Comments

  • kneejerk

    strange timing….seems a little knee jerky and attention grabbing for no reason…

  • Sriram Subramanian

    Rand is taking transparency to new levels, kudos to him and Moz. However, from his email to his employees, this news doesn’t meant to be shared this soon. Couldn’t Geekwire have waited a little?

    • http://www.sliverofice.com/ Erica McGillivray

      Rand actually posted the entire email that he sent to us employees on his blog before GeekWire posted it, so they didn’t snag it from any secret source. :)

    • http://geekwire.com Todd Bishop

      Just to clarify, Rand included the email in his public blog post, and that’s where we got it.

      • Sriram Subramanian

        Thanks Todd

    • Keri Morgret

      Geekwire is perfectly fine; Rand posted this on his blog, and that’s where they got the information from. Nothing was published in advance.

      • Sriram Subramanian

        Thanks for the clarifications – I appreciate your effort in clarifying this.

    • Kevin McCarthy

      Last time I checked, the press were supposed to report news when they uncovered it, not when it’s convenient to the company.

  • Frazzle McGee

    reins, not reigns.

  • http://startedinseattle.com/ ChetCrunch

    Classiest guy in town that Rand. :)

  • Blabbermouf

    Pointless company over hyped, I work in marketing never saw any real value compared to there competitors.

  • rayburt456

    Always impressed with the few folks in town who make 30% of the sensationalistic headlines.

  • http://troyjmorris.blogspot.com Troy Morris

    Again, Rand finds a way to be so totally comforting in his honesty.

    Bravo. Better to recognize you’re out of your depth and step aside than risk the lives of 134 other people. That takes some real strength and is a marker of sincere responsibility.

  • Blah

    Transparency is valued but this is weird. A CEO does not control who the next CEO is. That is a fundamental responsibility of a corporate Board of Directors, particularly one with a number of well regarding professional investors.
    Rand should have socialized this with his full Board before announcing to the company. Ultimately, that is not his call to make.
    Transparency is one thing. Thinking out loud publicy when you are a CEO is another and can be quite dangerous.

    • Trevor Klein

      Not to worry: This has actually been an ongoing discussion with the board for the last year or so (take a look at Rand’s email text above, right up at the top under “Quick recap”). It was in no way a unilateral (or bilateral) decision, and both Rand and Sarah are working with the board today to figure out the best way to take these next steps.

      • Blah

        Trevor, thank you. I have no idea how I missed that only a few lines into his note. I appreciate the correction. This all makes a lot more sense now.

  • Guest

    Congrats and happy trails to Rand! Over his tenure, Mozilla has made broad gains in its JavaScript performance, but I wish Sarah the best of luck in countering Chrome’s major pickups in market share. The open web lives on.

  • Red Russak

    Rand’s transparency #FTW! Excited for the future of Moz. I assume this means it will be Sarah who now has to travel the world speaking :-)

  • http://www.blueprintmarketing.com/ Thomas Zickell

    Rand has worked extremely hard for SEOmoz / Moz to become the company that it has. He deserves everyone’s respect if he decides that he would like to do whatever he likes. Obviously everyone will sincerely miss him and his ability to solve problems and always be a friend.

Job Listings on GeekWork